i don't really want to argue the point of loose vs. tight correlation any longer, hell if robbie can learn to play nice then certainly so can i.

what should be noted however that terms such tight/loose is v relative. so they need to objectively measured against something

so there are 2 ways. 1.) Measure the performance of those parlays, my back of envelope guess is +5% roi, (in line w/ say nfl b.s teasers w/ liberal rules) people disagrees yet cannot give me their fair assessment of the edge.

or 2.) measure it against other benchmark books. in this case...

again this is a OUTRIGHT LIE from the sportsbook, I already sent my entire parlay wagering history to justin7 and he can verify. my net winning from all parlays played was 4.3k, i have my full wagering log to back up this number. so they're just making up random large numbers to steal from my account. to date they have not provided justin with the calculation they used to reach the confiscation number. additionally during the first 2 months that I played the parlays, i LOST 1.8k playing them. so much so that i had to call them and ask for a reload, they even offered me a reload bonus on top, you think they do that b/c they were unhappy w/ my plays at the time when i was losing? w/ my reload and remaining balance i went on almost exactly 1 week run, but being limited and stopped playing. so to answer you question: NO, the amount they STOLE was NOT THE SAME amount I won from the parlays please dont' just the book's side on this b/c you're vip there.

as i stated in the previous thread, this is what makes this situation so grievious

1.) wagerweb have correlated parlay stipulation in rules, however many other books have the same rules in affect, and then they config their software to disallow those parlays.
2.) wagerweb software DISALLOWS/RESTRICTS high correlated parlays, (ie 1st half fav -20/ over 28), their software restricts any parlays where the spread/total ratio exceeds 50%.
3.) so by the fact that they restricted highly correlated parlays, and their software ACCEPTED my plays which i consider to be loosely correlated (1st H: C Mich -9.5 parlayed w/ 1st H: total...

[FONT="]below is the email that was sent to me the day after i had emailed them to ask what happend, after noticing the balance taken out of my account. (w/ obv personal info removed)
[/FONT]

[FONT="][/FONT]
[FONT="]pls note there were no mention of any warnings given to me (for the obv reason that there were not any)
[/FONT]

[FONT="][/FONT]
[FONT="]the reason given for them to justify their confiscation that i was a professional gambler, lol i can provide w-2's upon request to show that i am a full-time professional civic servant to society (at least to u.s)[/FONT]

[FONT="][/FONT]
[FONT="]i'm not a professional gambler, and...[/FONT]

pls read the original wagerweb theft write-up here: [URL]http://forum.sbrforum.com/sportsbooks-industry/291093-sportsbook-pure-theft.html[/URL]

cliff notes: i deposited at wagerweb and bet several parlays that were accepted and graded.

for the first 1.5 months, i lost almost 2k in those parlays. on early october 2009, i reloaded my account via moneygram for 2k (and was given a reload bonus on top presumably b/c i was losing in their sportsbook). subsequently, in the next 1+ week, i won for the first time. those wagers were accepted/graded and winnings credited to my acct.

they then limited my account in mid october to 100$ limits, at...

i'm so angry, i can barely type for right now. so bear w/ me.

i have deposited w/ this sportsbook (so far unnamed until i hear from this supervisor "MATT") (C rated sbr) since beginning of 09. i have since made several deposits via wu/mg and several withdraws via bankwire. i am overall net up in that book.

i wagered actively with this sportsbook since the start of 09 NFL season w/ combination of straight bets, teasers, and parlays, my action easily in 5 digits on average per week. then on 10/10/09, 2 weeks after I made a...

jesus i have 10k there and 24k rollover to complete before i can withdraw..

"
District Attorney Brown said that, according to a 131-count indictment filed in Queens
County Supreme Court the gambling ring promoted illegal sports betting in Queens County and
elsewhere and that the top two defendants ? alleged bookmakers Joseph J. Fafone and Eric Davis
Harp ? used various Internet websites, including betallsportshere.com, justwagers.com, betmsg.com,
betonline.com, and betrr.com, as well as toll-free telephone numbers to accept wagers. The
defendants also allegedly controlled a non-traditional ?wire room? in the form of an off-shore,"


http://www.gamblingiq.com/thirty-individuals-indicted-in-multi-million-dollar-off-shore-sports-bettinthirty-individuals-indicted-in-multi-million-dollar-off-shore-sports-betting-operationg-operation/